The growing presence of shanties, makeshift stalls, kiosks and other unauthorised structures around the Ojoo Bus Terminal in Ibadan became a subject of public concern in 2024, following an enforcement notice issued by the Oyo State Government directing squatters, stall owners and operators of kiosks around the area to relocate.
The government’s decision generated concerns among some of those affected, with representations reportedly made to the Chairman of Agidigbo FM, Alhaji Oriyomi Hamzat, seeking intervention and an appeal to the state authorities for a review of the enforcement process. The situation subsequently provided an opportunity for stakeholders to inspect the affected areas and examine the broader implications of unregulated development around one of Ibadan’s important gateways.
During the inspection, which I undertook alongside Hon. Mojeed Mogbonjubola Jagaban and Alhaji Oriyomi Hamzat, attention was drawn not only to the structures themselves but also to their relationship with the surrounding environment, particularly drainage channels and waste management.
For a city experiencing rapid expansion, the issue goes far beyond the removal of a few kiosks or shanties.
The urban development question
Ojoo occupies an important position within Ibadan’s urban geography. As one of the major entry points into the city, it serves as a transportation hub, commercial centre and gateway through which residents and visitors encounter Ibadan.
What happens around such locations therefore contributes significantly to the perception of the city.
When unplanned structures are allowed to progressively occupy road setbacks, drainage corridors, pedestrian spaces and other areas reserved for public infrastructure, the immediate consequence may appear to be limited to visual disorder. Over time, however, the consequences become much broader: obstruction of drainage, increased exposure to flooding, congestion, poor waste disposal, difficulty in infrastructure maintenance and deterioration of the general quality of the urban environment.
This is why the conversation about illegal structures should not be reduced to government versus traders or enforcement versus livelihood.
It is fundamentally a conversation about what kind of city we are deliberately building.
Enforcement is part of urban governance
Government enforcement of planning and environmental regulations should be taken seriously, particularly in a rapidly urbanising environment.
Rules governing land use, setbacks, drainage corridors, road reservations and public spaces exist for reasons that often become apparent only when infrastructure fails. A drainage channel occupied by a kiosk may appear harmless on an ordinary day, but its obstruction can become a serious public-safety issue during intense rainfall.
For this reason, enforcement should not be viewed simply as an exercise in removing people from their means of livelihood. It should be understood as part of the government’s responsibility to protect public infrastructure and preserve the long-term functionality of the city.
However, effective enforcement must also be predictable, humane and transparent.
Where informal economic activities have existed for years, government has a responsibility to communicate clearly, provide reasonable alternatives where possible and engage affected communities before enforcement. The objective should be to restore order without unnecessarily creating hardship.
Climate resilience makes the issue even more urgent
The concerns raised around Ojoo in 2024 remain relevant today because urban development is increasingly being shaped by climate realities.
As rainfall patterns become more intense and urban surfaces become increasingly covered by buildings, concrete and other impermeable materials, drainage infrastructure becomes even more important. Every blocked channel, occupied setback and improperly disposed pile of waste can contribute to the disruption of stormwater movement.
The explanation reportedly given by the Commissioner for Environment during the engagement was therefore significant. The government communicated that the intervention was intended, among other things, to protect residents and businesses from the consequences of blocked drainage pathways during heavy rainfall.
The state also indicated that provisions had been made to accommodate some commercial activities, including designated areas around the neighbourhood market.
This approach is important because sustainable urban management should not simply ask, “How do we remove these structures?” It should also ask, “Where should these activities appropriately take place?”
From enforcement to prevention
One of the biggest lessons from the Ojoo experience is that enforcement should ideally happen before informal development becomes entrenched.
A vacant setback today can become a row of shops tomorrow. A temporary kiosk can eventually become a permanent structure. A small accumulation of waste can develop into an environmental problem. By the time government intervenes, livelihoods may already depend on the location, making enforcement more difficult and socially sensitive.
This means that urban governance must move from reactive enforcement to continuous monitoring and preventive planning.
Planning authorities, environmental agencies, local governments, transport managers and communities must work together to identify vulnerable areas before illegal development becomes widespread.
There is also a role for citizens. Supporting government does not mean blindly endorsing every enforcement action; neither does questioning government policy mean defending illegal development. The more constructive position is to demand enforcement that is lawful, consistent, humane and properly planned.
The need for a balanced approach
The empathy expressed by Alhaji Oriyomi Hamzat towards those who could be affected by the enforcement was important. People who depend on informal businesses for their livelihoods cannot simply be treated as obstacles to urban development.
At the same time, compassion should not mean abandoning urban planning regulations.
A compassionate government can enforce its laws while providing alternatives. A responsible citizen can defend their livelihood while respecting regulations designed to protect the wider community.
The real objective should therefore be to create a balance between economic activity and urban order.
Ojoo should not merely be seen as a place where illegal structures were removed. It should be viewed as a case study in how Ibadan can manage growth, protect infrastructure and improve the quality of its urban gateways.
Looking beyond Ojoo
The lesson from Ojoo extends to other rapidly developing parts of Ibadan and Oyo State. As the metropolitan area expands, more peri-urban communities will transition from peripheral settlements into major commercial and residential centres.
If this growth is not properly managed, today’s temporary structures can become tomorrow’s permanent urban problems.
Government must therefore remain firm on planning and environmental standards while strengthening public engagement, providing viable alternatives for legitimate economic activities and ensuring that enforcement is applied consistently.
Urban development is not only about constructing new roads, buildings and infrastructure. It is equally about protecting the spaces that allow those investments to function.
The challenge before Ibadan is not simply how to accommodate a growing population, but how to grow without losing order, functionality, environmental resilience and the character of the city.
The events around Ojoo in 2024 offered an important reminder: urban order is easier to preserve than to restore. Enforcement, when necessary, should therefore be timely, consistent and humane, and supported by long-term planning that prevents the same problems from returning.
